The 3-ball numbers are grim. | The Boneyard

The 3-ball numbers are grim.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,765
Reaction Score
71,185
In the last ten games, we are 38 for 157, That's 24%. I use ten games because that is when our slide started at Seton Hall.

But to show how bad it has gotten, in our last four games we're 10-60. That's 16%.

For the year, we're still a respectable 118-365, just under the magic 33%. Which means we used to light it up pretty good from outside the arc earlier this season.

The good news is there is a lot of room for improvement.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,713
Reaction Score
33,148
The good news is there is a lot of room for improvement.

Yeah, but it would be nice if there a way to make the rims wider on our end of the court.
 

Marat

The Champ Is Here.
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
3,583
Reaction Score
14,515
In Nov/Dec UConn was almost deadly from 3. I believe we were at the top of the Big East in 3 point shooting. Some people thought with DD, JL, SN, etc.... UConn had its best 3 point shooting team in a long time.


"
.....Which means we used to light it up pretty good from outside the arc earlier this season.

"
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
517
Reaction Score
762
What's more grim is that in losses our opponents have shot roughly a combined 40% from 3.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,489
Reaction Score
37,270
Calhoun teams have usually "lost" on points gained from behind the arc. But they've always made it up, and then some, on points inside the arc.

Granted, this year is worse than most with our exceptionally bad perimeter defense, but I also suspect that we're not making it up on 2-pointers like we usually do.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,369
Reaction Score
13,971
In the last ten games, we are 38 for 157, That's 24%. I use ten games because that is when our slide started at Seton Hall.

But to show how bad it has gotten, in our last four games we're 10-60. That's 16%.

For the year, we're still a respectable 118-365, just under the magic 33%. Which means we used to light it up pretty good from outside the arc earlier this season.

The good news is there is a lot of room for improvement.


Boatright is 3-15 (20%)
Lamb is 17 - 63 (26%)
Napier is 12 - 53 (23%) missed his last 12.
Daniels is 1 - 11 (9%)
Roscoe is 0 - 1 (0%)
Giffey is 5 - 12 (42%)

That will lose you a lot of games.
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,204
Reaction Score
55,984
I'm more concerned about our 3 point defense
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
604
Reaction Score
166
Boatright is 3-15 (20%)
Lamb is 17 - 63 (26%)
Napier is 12 - 53 (23%) missed his last 12.
Daniels is 1 - 11 (9%)
Roscoe is 0 - 1 (0%)
Giffey is 5 - 12 (42%)

That will lose you a lot of games.
And yet Giffey doesnt turn it over every time he touches it like some on this list and hes also been shooting a far higher percentage...YET he played two min last night. Solid coaching there George.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
604
Reaction Score
166
Not that it matters, we still wouldve gotten destroyed last night no matter how amazingly Neils played. But it still makes you wonder what exactly Blaney is doing out there.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,357
Reaction Score
23,750
And Neils is a reluctant shooter. I was at the Samson Johnson game and saw how open Gif was most of the time and our guards never looked his way. I later posted give him the damn ball. Now that I've watched him play more minute I see why. As soon as he gets it he passes it again. Too bad because the way everyone else is shooting it's worth a try.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,369
Reaction Score
13,971
And yet Giffey doesnt turn it over every time he touches it like some on this list and hes also been shooting a far higher percentage...YET he played two min last night. Solid coaching there George.

Giffey is shooting a high percentage because he only shoots when he is wide open and I mean wiiiiiddddeeee open from 3.

If UConn could get him open looks like Kuric was getting, Giffey would be a huge asset, UConn doesn't do that often enough.

Giffey does everything fundamentally well, but he is reluctant to shoot and he rarely attacks. He may not turn the ball over but he doesn't do much on offense either (there is no risk in his game and thus little reward). He is a good player to have out there with someone who will drive and dish, but he isn't going to be creating his own shot or a shot for anyone else. He is a good passer, in that he rarely makes a bad pass, but he also won't make a great pass.

He should have played more last night because he does hustle.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
604
Reaction Score
166
Giffey is shooting a high percentage because he only shoots when he is wide open and I mean wiiiiiddddeeee open from 3.

If UConn could get him open looks like Kuric was getting, Giffey would be a huge asset, UConn doesn't do that often enough.

Giffey does everything fundamentally well, but he is reluctant to shoot and he rarely attacks. He may not turn the ball over but he doesn't do much on offense either (there is no risk in his game and thus little reward). He is a good player to have out there with someone who will drive and dish, but he isn't going to be creating his own shot or a shot for anyone else. He is a good passer, in that he rarely makes a bad pass, but he also won't make a great pass.

He should have played more last night because he does hustle.
Agreed. I'm not the biggest Niels fan and am Norway suggesting hes a stud but given how bad the other options have been playing and considering at least he can hit wide open threes and will play hard and not turn it over and at least look like he gives a crap why not let him play. There is nothing Shabazz did that warranted ten minutes of pt let alone 35
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
296
Guests online
2,661
Total visitors
2,957

Forum statistics

Threads
160,163
Messages
4,219,428
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom