Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ConnHuskBask, post: 2059769, member: 632"] [USER=6716]@AntG168[/USER] you're original quote They were 20-12 (10-8) and if not banned for the post season, they would have been an NIT team. It's a very good coaching job for a first year coach in a tough situation. Also, this is your original quote, which was proven wrong by Ken Pom and RPI. It wasn't who over/under achieved. I'm sorry, a tournament team lost a handful of players - like nearly every tournament does - and then went on to win 20 games. Winning an NCAA title is a masterpiece, the first season was a very good job, but the last three have stunk. I just would like to know why after damn near two decades of ranked squads, deep NCAA runs and 4 national titles, we're accepting close wins vs lousy AAC teams and giving the tired excuse against a team with an actual pulse in Houston. This is not UConn Basketball and Ollie needs to figure it out and quickly. He's ours for what I deem to be better, than worse, but the last three seasons there has been a lot of talent and extremely underwhelming results. Not for nothing but even the 2014 title team had a pretty poor regular season as well. [/QUOTE]