Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HuskyHawk, post: 4018879, member: 1414"]
Oh sure.  I want a stable situation. AAC makes no sense for them.  Old B12 with new members beats that.  The B12 can kill the AAC if that's what it comes to.   I've said since this started that it can be small, B12 backfills 2, or it can be bigger.  
[LIST]
[*]If the B10 goes to 16, I think KU is the most logical fit.  I don't think Iowa State is getting in with Iowa there, and UVA and NC have a tough ACC GOR plus regional ties.  Colorado can get out and would get out. 
[*]The Pac then has some decisions.  It could expand eastward, grab Texas Tech, K State, OK State, maybe Baylor (good athletics, but eastern TX and has issues).  If they lost CU they'd need a 5th.  But those 4(5) plus Utah and the AZ schools make a decent southwestern pod.  It's feasible, and the PAC needs more games not on Pacific time. 
[*]If the ACC does nothing, and the Pac raids the B12, then WVU, Iowa State, TCU keep the name and fill with the best AAC schools and perhaps BYU, Boise, Colorado State.   It would still be better than the current American, and they'd dump Tulane, ECU, WSU and probably Temple.  
[/LIST]
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach