test | The Boneyard

test

Status
Not open for further replies.
.-.
C only works on "Yes" or "No" questions
 
The only test I take is the weekly test that pops up on my tv.....You'd think the government would spend 99 cents for a nice ringtone,instead of that nasty buzzer....some Senator must be getting a kickback for it from the early 50's...
 
This reminds me of sign posted in the Quality Assurance department of an engineering company I once worked for -- "Before you ask me to run a test, determine what you are going to do if the test is (A) true, or (B) false. If A and B are the same, don't ask me to run the test."
 
.-.
"In response to Roman numeral 27...
section three, part two...
of subset D... of the question...
the answer is...
The answer is... four?"
Rodney Dangerfield as Thornton Melon
in Back to school.
 
Test 1 PSB.png


This has been a Test of:

THE BONEYARD TEST SYSTEM
.
.
.
.
.
Had this been an Actual Test:

The Bishop Fulton J Sheen Chair for Boneyard Testing, Prof Y. R. Chief : Would be laughing at your inadequate answers.

We now return you to our thread
 
JS said:
I've often thought the Boneyard can make a thread out of nothing. But I was wrong.

Nothing has more substance.

2Q==
Expand ...

Did you mean nothing has more substance or NOTHING has more substance?

Wouldn't saying "everything has more substance" make more sense?
 
.-.
doggydaddy said:
Did you mean nothing has more substance or NOTHING has more substance?

Wouldn't saying "everything has more substance" make more sense?
Expand ...

Is that a trick question???? I hate tests with trick questions...
 
doggydaddy said:
Did you mean nothing has more substance or NOTHING has more substance?

Wouldn't saying "everything has more substance" make more sense?
Expand ...
Ah, Doggydaddy, you fail to appreciate the exquisiteness of the ambiguous insult. The one that leaves the victim free to take the positive interpretation -- provided he is a fool.

I see you've entertained both interpretations.

So here are a couple more to ponder (with a nod, in one case, to Churchill):

You're a modest person, Doggydaddy, with much to be modest about.

I see your latest analysis pinned at the top of the page and will waste no time reading it.
 
JS said:
Ah, Doggydaddy, you fail to appreciate the exquisiteness of the ambiguous insult. The one that leaves the victim free to take the positive interpretation -- provided he is a fool.

I see you've entertained both interpretations.

So here are a couple more to ponder (with a nod, in one case, to Churchill):

You're a modest person, Doggydaddy, with much to be modest about.

I see your latest analysis pinned at the top of the page and will waste no time reading it.
Expand ...

I could care less! ( but I won't.)
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,368
Messages
4,568,503
Members
10,472
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom