UcMiami
How it is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,197
- Reaction Score
- 47,328
I hope we can put to bed the various threads of disdain for Syracuse now (on the women's side of Uconn fandom.) Was interested in the lead-up to hear Hillsman talk about the continuing contact he has had with the Stewart family and to learn how strong the bond between Sykes and Stewart has remained through their respective college careers.
Did everyone notice the long and very affectionate hug between Stewart and Hillsman after the game - there was a lot of feeling on both sides and no sign of animosity, resentment, whatever between the two.
And Syracuse played well and physically, but it was never a rough house game - it was straight up basketball and we had the better team. And it really would not have made a lick of difference if Syracuse had played us this year or last year. They were a team like Louisville (twice) that got on a really hot streak in the NCAAs and surprised some very good teams to get to the championship game. Louisville had played Uconn multiple times, Syracuse had not and it made no difference - Uconn in all three cases was just a much better team and defensively strong enough to burst the 'hot streak' bubble. 22, 33, and 31 says everything. And I didn't see any sign of 'surprise' from Syracuse - they actually played with great ball control - against a team that usually forces 20+ turnovers, Syracuse keep theirs to 12! and forced 17 against a team that averages under 12. Both teams did a good job of not allowing live ball turnovers except for that 16 point run stretch where Uconn was uncharacteristically loose with the ball under pressure.
Where Uconn won the game was ironically in rebounding and three point defense - two areas where some felt they were 'suspect' all year long. That is called coaching and commitment.
Did everyone notice the long and very affectionate hug between Stewart and Hillsman after the game - there was a lot of feeling on both sides and no sign of animosity, resentment, whatever between the two.
And Syracuse played well and physically, but it was never a rough house game - it was straight up basketball and we had the better team. And it really would not have made a lick of difference if Syracuse had played us this year or last year. They were a team like Louisville (twice) that got on a really hot streak in the NCAAs and surprised some very good teams to get to the championship game. Louisville had played Uconn multiple times, Syracuse had not and it made no difference - Uconn in all three cases was just a much better team and defensively strong enough to burst the 'hot streak' bubble. 22, 33, and 31 says everything. And I didn't see any sign of 'surprise' from Syracuse - they actually played with great ball control - against a team that usually forces 20+ turnovers, Syracuse keep theirs to 12! and forced 17 against a team that averages under 12. Both teams did a good job of not allowing live ball turnovers except for that 16 point run stretch where Uconn was uncharacteristically loose with the ball under pressure.
Where Uconn won the game was ironically in rebounding and three point defense - two areas where some felt they were 'suspect' all year long. That is called coaching and commitment.