Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ninety-nine, post: 5331772, member: 5497"] There were a few plays in this game where the call on the field benefited Syracuse, and there was no review despite a lot of uncertainty as to whether someone had possession or not. We still don't know whether or not the correct call was made. However, when Cuse fumbled and UConn recovered early in the game, the play was reviewed and the call was (correctly) reversed. And then there was the bullcrap review of the forward pass that allegedly might have been a fumble (no way), which negated a second-down incompletion (and near interception) as a null play. All of those situations wound up benefiting Syracuse. We got one important judgment call the whole game (the pass interference in the end zone, a correct call). Meanwhile, tons of obvious holding penalties were ignored, while UConn got flagged on a ticky-tack holding call. Garbage refereeing that shows UConn gets second-class treatment. [/QUOTE]