Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Travelman6, post: 3909306, member: 7597"] This did not age well at all. Cuse just made their second sweet 16 since 2018 and a FF was not too long ago, 2016. I wish UConn could be "this bad" since 2016.... Cuse gets to enjoy the second weekend while UConn was bounced in the first round by a very average Maryland team and barely scored over 50...If that makes Cuse bad what does that make our Huskies?? This title would have made more sense if Cuse was replaced with Pitt, if we are going with former BE teams in the ACC. Or BC, but everyone already knows that, including BC. Pitt seems to be in some kind of denial. Let's be honest, they'd win by at least 10 over this year's UConn. It'd be a similar ugly type game to the Maryland game, 65-53 type of affair. It is a hard pill to swallow, but Cuse was better than UConn this year and they've been better than UConn since the 2014-15 season. Dislike them all you want, I know I do, but the last time UConn [B]had a better season[/B] and was better was the 2013-14 season. [/QUOTE]