Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SimpleDawg, post: 3348280, member: 9267"] Well, it looked like Lexie Hull was on a roll until these last few games, but I expect she's the one to watch out for anyways. And despite Jump being a zone shooter, I think anyone shooting that hot is dangerous. I think the fact that you don't know the Stanford team you're gonna get does give Tara one advantage. Still, both teams are deep. Last night, Stanford had Jump and Jones doing most of the work where Danberry, Bibby, and Jackson were combined 22-34 from the field for 57 points. It looks like Danberry is on a roll, so I suspect she's our best bet. I think she'll have to work around the shot blockers of Stanford but I trust she's learned how to do that.... somewhat at least. Though I think Jackson has a longer extension with her arm that could help, but those 2 definitely need to finish around the rim. Jackson is coming on at a great time. I think she's our next best bet, because she's inherently hard to defend so it'll be interesting who's gonna get on her. Carrington I would guess is the best option, though Jackson might have a few inches on her. We could use Espinoza-Hunter right about now, so I hope she's shaken whatever she had last night off. If we lose the 3-point shooting battle against Stanford, hopefully we win the turnover battle because obviously everyone knows we usually win that. But Stanford is deeper than an average team, so they should have some good ball handlers on that roster. [/QUOTE]