Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Still great, but overrated athletes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Deepster, post: 5310077, member: 25"] I asked ChatGPT, a non biased source, to outline what would have happened if Jeter and Young switched teams for their entire career. This is a fascinating hypothetical: swapping Derek Jeter and Michael Young, two elite shortstops of their era, and imagining how their careers might have unfolded had they played for each other’s teams their entire careers. Let’s look at the comparison based on performance, context (team, media, postseason), and legacy, then analyze how the swap might have changed public and professional perception. Swap Scenario: Jeter on the Rangers, Young on the Yankees Michael Young as a Career Yankee Upside: • Bigger Stage: Playing in New York, Young’s consistent .300+ batting averages would’ve gained far more national attention. • Postseason Exposure: With the Yankees’ perennial playoff appearances, Young would likely have appeared in 100+ postseason games. • Team Success: Likely picks up multiple rings, significantly boosting his legacy. • Marketing & Fame: Would have benefited from the Yankee spotlight, perhaps turning into a household name and HOF candidate. Downside: • Defensive Concerns: Young was a below-average shortstop defensively, worse than Jeter in many metrics. Yankee fans and media may have scrutinized this more heavily. • No “Captain” Mystique: Even in NY, it’s unclear whether Young would’ve developed the same aura as Jeter without the clutch postseason moments Jeter delivered. Probable Outcome: Michael Young becomes a beloved, respected Yankee — probably a 3–4× champion, potential Hall of Fame fringe candidate with 2,500+ hits and greater WAR due to team context. Media profile rises dramatically. ⸻ ⚾ Derek Jeter as a Career Ranger Upside: • Offensive Performance: Jeter’s consistency and leadership still stand out in any uniform. Likely remains a .300 hitter with 2,500–3,000 hits. • Locker Room Leadership: Helps build a winning culture in Texas earlier; maybe accelerates the Rangers’ 2010–11 rise. Downside: • Less Postseason Success: Without the Yankees’ deep playoff runs, Jeter might only reach 1 or 2 postseasons, likely with no championships. • Reduced Fame: Fewer clutch postseason moments = no “Mr. November,” no “Flip Play,” no 3,000th hit HR in Yankee Stadium. • Media Profile: The Texas market offers less exposure; Jeter’s brand (and endorsements) would not be nearly as huge. Probable Outcome: Jeter still becomes a star, probably a 10+ time All-Star, hits 3,000, but never wins a ring. Hall of Fame induction still likely — though not unanimous — and without the mythos. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Still great, but overrated athletes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom