JRRRJ
Chief Didacticist
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2011
- Messages
- 1,495
- Reaction Score
- 5,144
...download the spreadsheet here.
It is definitely survive-and-advance, so criticism of the play is a vastly distant second to the fact of survival.
That being said, there's a few puzzling (to me) things about the tournament stats so far:
The team's points/attempt is 15% lower (1.17 vs 1.37) than the regular season, which included a goodly number of much better teams than the ones they've played in the tourney. And, no, it's not (only) the subs. And it's despite the offensive RBs being 25% higher in the tourney so far (yay, Azura and Meghan, who make up more than half the difference).
A/TO ratio is more than 25% lower. And the subs are at 1.00 for the tourney vs. 0.88 for the regular season, so it's definitely not their fault.
Not criticisms, just oddities.
It was good to see all the bench taking shots, and I thought Meghan looked like she belonged when she was in with the starters. Keep it up!
It is definitely survive-and-advance, so criticism of the play is a vastly distant second to the fact of survival.
That being said, there's a few puzzling (to me) things about the tournament stats so far:
The team's points/attempt is 15% lower (1.17 vs 1.37) than the regular season, which included a goodly number of much better teams than the ones they've played in the tourney. And, no, it's not (only) the subs. And it's despite the offensive RBs being 25% higher in the tourney so far (yay, Azura and Meghan, who make up more than half the difference).
A/TO ratio is more than 25% lower. And the subs are at 1.00 for the tourney vs. 0.88 for the regular season, so it's definitely not their fault.
Not criticisms, just oddities.
It was good to see all the bench taking shots, and I thought Meghan looked like she belonged when she was in with the starters. Keep it up!