T
Thank you for the spreadsheet. Please forgive my ignorance--but what value is added by taking the games stats and projecting them into 40 minutes? What is learned from the mathematical manipulation? Is there something to be seen further down the season, that I'm missing?? No offense, I'm trying to understand what you are doing???????
Looking at a box score without the minutes, you would have no idea of the efficiency of a player who scored 10 points versus one who scored 20. If the one scoring 20 played 40 minutes and the one scoring 10 played 10 minutes, the second player scored twice as many points per minute as the first. You can argue (with some justification) that
which minutes (e.g. first five of the game versus last five) should be taken into account, but even that isn't completely revealing because sometimes all the opponent's starters are in the game until the end. Also,
which teammates were on the floor with her is a significant factor. However, I don't have the urge to go through the play-by-play listing to winkle out those facts.
Over a season, most players (except the end-of-bench denizens) will be in more varied situations, so the effect of when & with who will even out somewhat and the per-minute stats become more revealing when you look at the summaries.
I've just taken the box score and standardized it to performance-per-unit-time.