Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 2062526, member: 3535"] The efg% for all five starters is over 50%. Though counting a team like Depaul who quit during the game and counting Temple who is isn't that good inflates the numbers big time. If you are going to look at the top 15 teams and add tulane numbers would be different. It will be interesting to see if a team will try to test that and throw some type of gimmick defense at them and take a chance on the others. Oddly Lou has the worst efg% of the 5. Collier has been amazing. [B]EFG% using OP's teams:[/B] Collier 70.08% (Just think when you have a 60% efg% you are considered off the charts. LeBron's and Curry's best year. At 70% DeAndre Jordan has been 70% but that is because he basically takes shots around 6 - 7 feet from the bakset and mostly dunks. Gabby-- 55.29% Chong-- 53.49% Nurse-- 53.21% Lou-- 52.96% [B]Take away the DePaul game and the two Temple Games and add the Tulane game[/B] in which these games we had a chance for a close game or lose at least during the games there was some type of threat: [B]EFG%[/B] Collier: 64.36% Chong: 53.45% Gabby: 50% Lou: 47.32% Nurse: 42.86% **** Nurse was poor because the start of the season she was awful in terms of efficiency fearing she had to do too much. One she settled into her role - numbers were different. And Lou had one significant awful shooting game vs USC. Take away the one bad game- Lou is is 51% efg%. Take away the two bad gamea- Nurse s 52.56% efg%. [/QUOTE]