Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3584056, member: 3535"] I wanted her for UCONN, and I think you and I even had an argument about it. But I'm with you in regards to any assumption that Carrington would have been "assured big minutes if healthy." I realize she played for a top ten team, but UCONN was a top 5 team without her. Unless she can play PF - UCONN has Paige, CWill and Evina as a tough 3 to break (even if Paige doesn't start). These 3 payaers combined will see about 84+ minutes and at the very, very, very, very worst Anna will see 15 -- at the very, very, very, very, very worst if Carrington would beat her out. - Unless ofc Carrington shows she can be an efficient shooter otherwise Anna is unique vs Carrington. And it's nowhere near locked in that Carrington is better than AM this upcoming year. And Geno does value shooting -- a big time strength of AM. Which makes her potentially a big time player. That's 99 minutes (PB, CW, EW and AM) from 1-3 spots excluding small minutes from Muhl and Mir. In addition, Mir will probably get a few minutes at PF during blowouts. A 5th year sr like Carrington isn't going to transfer to a school so she can get "blowout minutes." So where's the assuredness that Carrington is going to get "big" minutes from a team that was already 5th as they bring in Paige and Evina? [/QUOTE]