Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
General Women's Basketball Forum
Standford is suppose to be the smart kids
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="tchalla1, post: 4145966, member: 9866"] I agree with you but the refs did not lose that game for Stanford--Tara did--like Geno, she is embedded into doing the same thing the same way she's always done it, and without doing any reaction strategy. Example, she takes Brink out and she's just eating Boston alive, has completely snuffed her, but what does Tara do? She takes Brink out with the two fouls. When will traditional coaches understand the the points you score in the second quarter--or the ones that don't score in the second quarter--count just as much as the ones you score in the 4th quarter! Perhaps they count even more in the second quarter because with a couple more baskets and the Sanford lead would have been by 24 points or more and this would have broken SC. But no, let's take Brink out--which makes no sense because even if she were to foul out, Stanford has plenty of depth in its front court. But let's take Brink out and allow Boston to recharge and regain her confidence. Then Tara takes both Jones and Wilson out and since there's no one to bring the ball up court, they have Hull and all getting their pockets picked repeatedly by a much smaller and quicker player--Henderson--who is much adept to imitating steals and so Stanford commences to turn the ball over about 7 or 8 times in 3Q due to guard play and then Henderson and SC score a quick 14 points. How stupid--why?, because we must stay with our regular substitution patterns... Forget the managing to the course of the game, which BTW, Dawn does a great job of. I can't get on Tara too much because Geno pretty much does the same thing--and he fails to realize this small but evident fact: Before, when you had Stewie, Tuck, KML, Hartley, Dolson, et al, yes you didn't have to react so much to what the other team is doing and change philosophies during the game because your talent level can win you games of and by itself. Having five AA's helps an awful lot. But now with the equity and party in the WBB, can you still afford to coach this way? Programmed coaching? [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,471
Messages
4,397,442
Members
10,209
Latest member
noelle
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
General Women's Basketball Forum
Standford is suppose to be the smart kids
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom