SwingDog
"THIS is the life you have"
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 766
- Reaction Score
- 2,460
Kentucky blew out Auburn by 27 points today. Today the starting 5 consisted of four freshman and one sophomore. The team is currently ranked 4th in the nation. How would you finish this statement? Kentucky's success is a result of: (a) Drawing the nation's best high school players as a result of Kentucky's rich basketball history, (b) Drawing the nation's best players because Kentucky plays in the SEC, a Power 5 conference (c) Calipari's brilliant coaching (d) a, b & c or (e) none of the above
I HATE the "one and done" nature of the Kentucky basketball program (and just plain don't like the Wildcats), but I have to give Calipari credit for being able to quite consistently develop successful teams from almost a new slate of players each season. To take a bunch of highly talented basketball players and build a true team out of them in such short time is impressive. Kentucky's success, due at least in part to their strength in recruiting, is all the more reason I marvel at the success UConn was able to achieve under Calhoun without having the benefit of the traditions of Kentucky/Duke/UNC to tout on the recruiting trail.
All of this to say, I am a UConn Huskies fan through and through. I love the fact that UConn's student athletes tend to develop over the course of 4 years and occasionally 2 or 3. To me, those extra few years are critical in terms of character development which is just as (if not more) important than developing as a basketball player. UConn's basketball program is an anomaly in this regard. (Although Mark Few has done an incredible job at Gonzaga as well.) Calhoun was able to build the program, bring in the right student athletes, and win when there was yet no history to draw from. Of course, the Big East was a premier basketball conference during his tenure. I am looking forward to UConn, under the leadership of Dan Hurley, once again competing and winning among some of the best teams in the country, including the best of the AAC as well as Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina, etc.
I HATE the "one and done" nature of the Kentucky basketball program (and just plain don't like the Wildcats), but I have to give Calipari credit for being able to quite consistently develop successful teams from almost a new slate of players each season. To take a bunch of highly talented basketball players and build a true team out of them in such short time is impressive. Kentucky's success, due at least in part to their strength in recruiting, is all the more reason I marvel at the success UConn was able to achieve under Calhoun without having the benefit of the traditions of Kentucky/Duke/UNC to tout on the recruiting trail.
All of this to say, I am a UConn Huskies fan through and through. I love the fact that UConn's student athletes tend to develop over the course of 4 years and occasionally 2 or 3. To me, those extra few years are critical in terms of character development which is just as (if not more) important than developing as a basketball player. UConn's basketball program is an anomaly in this regard. (Although Mark Few has done an incredible job at Gonzaga as well.) Calhoun was able to build the program, bring in the right student athletes, and win when there was yet no history to draw from. Of course, the Big East was a premier basketball conference during his tenure. I am looking forward to UConn, under the leadership of Dan Hurley, once again competing and winning among some of the best teams in the country, including the best of the AAC as well as Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina, etc.