FriarJ
Never Surrender!
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2011
- Messages
- 22,998
- Reaction Score
- 6,662
they're the ACC's problem now..
clearly joking, and if you actually read the article you would see that police are in the early stages of looking into this. we just read that someone made claims against him, so i'm going to wait until we're certain what happened before i pass judgement.joking or not, the fact this is what you're thinking about when reading this is beyond idiotic.
this story is equally gross to penn st. cover ups from former cuse players in the police force and OTL had this story in 2003 and never ran it... now they have a 2nd accuser.
what is wrong with this world. truly sad if true
clearly joking, and if you actually read the article you would see that police are in the early stages of looking into this. we just read that someone made claims against him, so i'm going to wait until we're certain what happened before i pass judgement.
joking or not, the fact this is what you're thinking about when reading this is beyond idiotic.
this story is equally gross to penn st. cover ups from former cuse players in the police force and OTL had this story in 2003 and never ran it... now they have a 2nd accuser.
what is wrong with this world. truly sad if true
obviously you haven't read it
they were aware back in '03 and the officer who handled the accusation was a former Cuse bball player.
Syracuse university also did an investigation in '05 for 4 months looking into the situation and found no wrongdoing. Outside the Lines had the story back in '03 and decided not to run the story until they just recently had a 2nd accuser come forward.
It is, but if it happened back in the '80s or '90s, the statute of limitations is long up. The local Syracuse newspaper also had this story in 2003 but didn't run it because they could find no one to corroborate. In light of the PSU story, it would be easy for someone to exaggerate a story, or even make one up, and be found credible because of the current sensitivity. Of course, I have no reason to believe it happened here, but it's something to keep in mind here, especially since this story has been out for a long time, and no one could find anyone else to corroborate it.The 2nd accuser is a relative of the first. This feels more to me like a relationship that ended badly. That said, if the kid was under 18 when the relationship started, it's a crime.
Disagree. The PSU case makes it more likely for the media to report any potential copycats, since these kind of stories get people riled up and increases ratings and webpage hits. Not that they'll report something false, but they'll report something that has at least some credibility, but may not be entirely true.The story would not be released unless there is very good credibility to the case. The Penn State case has been going on for several years now. It wasn't until a few weeks ago that it became national news. There is definitely a lot of information that will be coming out in the next few days/ weeks. This article is clearly the tip of the iceberg. Only time will tell though.
it was apparently investigated by the post standard, the police, and the university, and no one could find anything, and the witnesses the victim cited did not corroborate his story. if bernie is guilty i say let him rot, but for the love of god let's get the facts straight first. it's not a new allegation.It is, but if it happened back in the '80s or '90s, the statute of limitations is long up. The local Syracuse newspaper also had this story in 2003 but didn't run it because they could find no one to corroborate. In light of the PSU story, it would be easy for someone to exaggerate a story, or even make one up, and be found credible because of the current sensitivity. Of course, I have no reason to believe it happened here, but it's something to keep in mind here, especially since this story has been out for a long time, and no one could find anyone else to corroborate it.
The 2nd accuser is a relative of the first. This feels more to me like a relationship that ended badly. That said, if the kid was under 18 when the relationship started, it's a crime.
The article says that Davis was in 7th grade.
\
this story is equally gross to penn st. cover ups from former cuse players in the police force and OTL had this story in 2003 and never ran it... now they have a 2nd accuser.
Disagree. The PSU case makes it more likely for the media to report any potential copycats, since these kind of stories get people riled up and increases ratings and webpage hits. Not that they'll report something false, but they'll report something that has at least some credibility, but may not be entirely true.
I think this is a pretty reasonable position to take. And the Penn State comparison isn't exact, it seems to me. In this case there were a series of investigations and no corroberating evidence was found. There is a reason that we require evidence, not simply denunciations, before finding people guilty (see Duke Lacrosse on what can happen when you don't have actual evidence). Also you can't take action against someone when noone is willing to talk. This case has a somewhat different feel to it than Penn State, since it sounds like people did the right thing, or at least tried to, though in many people's minds it won't be different.it was apparently investigated by the post standard, the police, and the university, and no one could find anything, and the witnesses the victim cited did not corroborate his story. if bernie is guilty i say let him rot, but for the love of god let's get the facts straight first. it's not a new allegation.
The first article I read said 12 years ending when Davis was 27. Davis claims there are many other victims. Either they come forward or they don't.