Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Gamecockfan77, post: 3143533, member: 6414"] Well you were insinuating that I had said that South Carolina was the favorite in the SEC last year and I'm pretty sure I never said that. I was asking who had said that. In general, I'm somewhat confused why Vic going to the Elite 8 with McCowans, Howard, and a host of seniors, is better than Staley going to the Elite 8 with Wilson after losing Davis, Gray, Coates and Cuevas-Moore (injury). That's only returning 2 of your top 6. National Titles Staley 1 Vic 0 Final Fours Staley 2 Vic 2 Elite Eights Staley 3 Vic 3 Sweet 16s Staley 7 Vic 4 SEC Titles Staley 4 Vic 2 SECT Titles Staley 4 Vic 1 Head to Head Staley 11 Vic 3 (Vic has won 3/4, all with the more talented team) I get that you think Vic hung the moon because he's your dude. He's good. But he's quite literally done nothing that Staley hasn't. South Carolina was equally bad if not worse than Miss State when Staley took over. South Carolina has played world class schedules every year Staley has been able to do it and with the exception of UConn has competed with them all. I guess that is the one thing Vic has done. Beat UConn post Stewie at the buzzer that one time. I do appreciate that one since it made our title a foregone conclusion. I think it's odd that you think that Miss State is going to be stacked in the future, I guess based on players you have never seen on the floor, but South Carolina's future is uncertain because the players coming in are unproven. Cool. I agree. South Carolina's ceiling is unknown for the future. It may or may not reach a championship level. Not sure why you think Miss State is a sure thing in comparison, but whatever. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,433

Messages: 4,396,128

Members: 10,209

Latest member: gemini*trvl