nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,525
- Reaction Score
- 34,193
There are a lot of threads comparing these players to past players or trying to figure out which players that left weren't that good or which players that were added were so great. I think the answer is neither. Sometimes a team just clicks.
These players don't remind me of any previous players, but this team is showing signs of a previous UConn team that just clicked. Going into 1989, UConn had two true top tier recruits on that team: Chris Smith and Scott Burrell, and Burrell was a raw freshman that was still playing baseball in his summers. Tate George was a tall, slow, good-not-great point guard. 6' John Gwynn was a decent scorer off the bench with his odd line-drive shot. The rest of the upperclassmen were barely role players. Lyman DePriest was a defensive specialist who basically had to dunk to score. Steve Pikiell was coming back from a serious injury and would not be much more than a practice player, and Murray Williams barely got off the bench. After that, there were some freshmen and sophomores that seemed to have potential to contribute minutes. An undersized, skinny center in Rod Sellers, a tall, unathletic center in Dan Cyrulik, a big strong frosh named Toraino Walker that had gotten a throwaway scholarship. It was a team that with a little luck and a monster season by Chris Smith might challenge for an NCAA Tournament bid, but the fan base would have been OK with the NIT. Then, in the fall of 1989, Calhoun beat out Lou Carnesecca for a 6'8 Israeli named Nadav Henefeld that would have preferred New York but playing time looked easier to get at UConn.
It was magic after that. That team averaged 79.1 ppg with a 13 ppg positive point differential, and it only had ONE star player, Chris Smith. Henefeld only averaged 11.7 ppg and Burrell was at 8.2 ppg on a team that scored a lot of points. Like our current team, the scoring seemed to come from all directions, often out of transition from a defense that always seemed to be in the right place at the right time. That 13 ppg differential is a big number, bigger than the 1994, 1998, 2002, 2011 and 2014 teams, and the Dream Team did it against a very tough schedule.
For those of you under 40, you can't imagine how good the Big East was back then. Syracuse and Georgetown were loaded with NBA talent. St. Johns was a great coached team that was very tough to beat. Villanova had a Hall of Fame Coach in Massimino, and Providence was very good and mean. 6 of 9 Big East teams would make the NCAA Tournament that season, and Pitt and Seton Hall would have made it in any other league but just kept losing because the Big East was so good. 3 of the 9 teams were ranked in the Top 10 going into the NCAA Tournament. And this hodgepodge of a UConn team tore through the league, going 12-4 and 28-5 going into the NCAA Tournament, ultimately losing to Duke on a buzzer beater. The Dream Team was one bobbled steal from going to the Final Four.
The Dream Team didn't have better players than later UConn teams. Actually, the Dream Team's players were objectively worse than many of the UConn teams that would be successful over the next 24 years. But they played so well together. They just clicked. That does not happen often, and sometimes does not even last a full season. When it is happening, the best thing to do is just enjoy it.
Those arguing for this player playing more or that player playing less, I say don't change a thing. This is a chemistry team. I know why this success is happening, but I don't know what the coaches did to make it happen, and it is possible the coaches don't know either. And there is nothing wrong with that. There are great college coaches who never have a team that just clicks, where 1 + 1 + 1 = 10. All the UConn coaches need to do is recognize that it is happening, and ride it as long as they can. Don't fix something that is already working tremendously well. This is the kind of season that can not only result in a deep March run, but catapult a program and coach to another level, just like it did for a mid-sized New England state school and its fast talking, foul-tempered coach 33 years ago.
These players don't remind me of any previous players, but this team is showing signs of a previous UConn team that just clicked. Going into 1989, UConn had two true top tier recruits on that team: Chris Smith and Scott Burrell, and Burrell was a raw freshman that was still playing baseball in his summers. Tate George was a tall, slow, good-not-great point guard. 6' John Gwynn was a decent scorer off the bench with his odd line-drive shot. The rest of the upperclassmen were barely role players. Lyman DePriest was a defensive specialist who basically had to dunk to score. Steve Pikiell was coming back from a serious injury and would not be much more than a practice player, and Murray Williams barely got off the bench. After that, there were some freshmen and sophomores that seemed to have potential to contribute minutes. An undersized, skinny center in Rod Sellers, a tall, unathletic center in Dan Cyrulik, a big strong frosh named Toraino Walker that had gotten a throwaway scholarship. It was a team that with a little luck and a monster season by Chris Smith might challenge for an NCAA Tournament bid, but the fan base would have been OK with the NIT. Then, in the fall of 1989, Calhoun beat out Lou Carnesecca for a 6'8 Israeli named Nadav Henefeld that would have preferred New York but playing time looked easier to get at UConn.
It was magic after that. That team averaged 79.1 ppg with a 13 ppg positive point differential, and it only had ONE star player, Chris Smith. Henefeld only averaged 11.7 ppg and Burrell was at 8.2 ppg on a team that scored a lot of points. Like our current team, the scoring seemed to come from all directions, often out of transition from a defense that always seemed to be in the right place at the right time. That 13 ppg differential is a big number, bigger than the 1994, 1998, 2002, 2011 and 2014 teams, and the Dream Team did it against a very tough schedule.
For those of you under 40, you can't imagine how good the Big East was back then. Syracuse and Georgetown were loaded with NBA talent. St. Johns was a great coached team that was very tough to beat. Villanova had a Hall of Fame Coach in Massimino, and Providence was very good and mean. 6 of 9 Big East teams would make the NCAA Tournament that season, and Pitt and Seton Hall would have made it in any other league but just kept losing because the Big East was so good. 3 of the 9 teams were ranked in the Top 10 going into the NCAA Tournament. And this hodgepodge of a UConn team tore through the league, going 12-4 and 28-5 going into the NCAA Tournament, ultimately losing to Duke on a buzzer beater. The Dream Team was one bobbled steal from going to the Final Four.
The Dream Team didn't have better players than later UConn teams. Actually, the Dream Team's players were objectively worse than many of the UConn teams that would be successful over the next 24 years. But they played so well together. They just clicked. That does not happen often, and sometimes does not even last a full season. When it is happening, the best thing to do is just enjoy it.
Those arguing for this player playing more or that player playing less, I say don't change a thing. This is a chemistry team. I know why this success is happening, but I don't know what the coaches did to make it happen, and it is possible the coaches don't know either. And there is nothing wrong with that. There are great college coaches who never have a team that just clicks, where 1 + 1 + 1 = 10. All the UConn coaches need to do is recognize that it is happening, and ride it as long as they can. Don't fix something that is already working tremendously well. This is the kind of season that can not only result in a deep March run, but catapult a program and coach to another level, just like it did for a mid-sized New England state school and its fast talking, foul-tempered coach 33 years ago.