Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 4690617, member: 1673"] Lol. I am presenting real facts. The facts you presented were …. none. You provided nothing for the reader to support your assertion. Nothing. You are counting on a “because I said so” defense. People who handle the ball more are going to have more turnovers. That’s simple logic. They will also have more assists, also simple logic. The ratio of the two determines how efficient they are, how many mistakes they make, how good their decisions or execution is. Once again, simple logic. Compared to other players handling the ball often, players considered to be elite, Muhl compares favorably. She had a couple fewer assists than Clark last year, but she had much fewer turnovers. By turnover rate I assume you mean per 40 minutes? Obviously, by simple logic again, Muhl’s will be higher than those who handle point duties less. So in the OSU game Muhl had 7 turnovers, Fudd only 4. But Muhl had 5 assists, Fudd only 1. Muhl has a higher rate per 40, but Fudd has a higher rate for how much they handle the ball. Which one should you trust more with handling the point with better decisions and fewer mistakes? Which one really turns the ball over more per handling? The guard with a 5/7 ratio, or the one with 1/4? Fwiw, Clark also had 7 turnovers in a game against OSU, in fewer minutes. Both her turnover rate per 40 and for the amount she handles the ball was higher than Muhl’s. Based on your concern that would indict Clark. But Clark also had 15 assists that game. I would say she had the better game against a common foe, even apart from her scoring and despite her higher turnover rate than Muhl. Drink the kool-aid? I claimed Muhl is good at passing, defense and making decisions in executing an offense. Since you already agree with two of those you must think I am drinking the kool-aid in claiming she makes good decisions. Please present some evidence besides ”I said so” to support that assertion. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach