Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="huskeynut, post: 3852331, member: 750"] Well it is that time of the year. The 16 team reveal is out and the debate begins. So I don't get worked up over it. It is what it is. The NCAA selection committee does the best it can but the process is flawed. The want a program, this year its NET, to plug in the data and spit out who is who. Then of course you can't have a league member in you first couple of games. I get it. NCAA wants an unbiased seeding. Never going to happen. You have human beings, with all their built-in biases, making decisions. Why was Michigan not in the 16? According to the committee they haven't played enough games. Really!!!! Same with South Florida. BTW, since we moved from CT to FL we have had season tickets to the Bulls' games. Guaranteed we would see our Huskies live at least once a year. Again, no consideration for USF because they haven't played enough games. The reality is UConn, SC, Louisville, Stanford, NC State, A & M, Baylor, Oregon, UCLA, Arizona, Michigan could get hot and run the table of 6 games. It's a wide open tournament. Parity has arrived. [/QUOTE]