Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 3530249, member: 1673"] Well, I'm responding because here you are making my case when you think you are refuting me. You have a problem with reading comprehension. Read my original post again, all subsequent ones match that. Not having contributions from bigs over 6'2" literally means you can have contributions from bigs who ARE 6'2". Quite literally that is what my statement means every time I made it, including the O. It is possible to win a championship game with "no bigs over 6'2" as you demonstrate with this very data here. It is your reading comprehension that is at fault, not me ever changing the criteria. [/QUOTE]