Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CL82, post: 2781907, member: 44"]
I don't.  Honoring your agreements would be by most people considered moral.  Trying to change an agreement after fact would not be considered moral.  Under the terms of the Ollie's agreement with UConn, the agreement terminates, with no further payment obligation, if Kevin breaks NCAA rules.  He did so.  So it is amoral of him to now say "Well I am not entitled to this money but pay me anyway or I will do my best to embarrass the university?"  
  Absolutely not.  There is a huge amount of effort that goes into monetizing college sports.  The coach has a role, but your writing off the efforts of dozens of others is silly.

I think you are confusing us with Lousiville.

You must because you are talking a lot about them in this post

Ollie is entitled to the money he earned as of the termination date.  He's not entitled to a dollar more under the contract.  Since that is the agreement of the parties, do you support that?  If not is that an amoral position?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach