Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BlueMAB, post: 2776834, member: 920"] Which is the reason an arbitrator may find in Ollie's favor. You don't have to agree with it, but it's a plausible outcome. Failure to perform is not just cause to firing him without paying the $10 million. I didn't say that one was strong and one was weak. Only that one would still require they pay him $10 million and the other $0. And the fact that you're all acknowledging that if he was winning he wouldn't have been fired, but refuse to understand that a neutral arbitrator might come to the same conclusion and decide in Ollie's favor is really quite ironic. [/QUOTE]