Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
General Women's Basketball Forum
So, how is the bubble defined for the Tournament
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 3445072, member: 7492"] I am an analyst by trade, so I am operating under the understanding that the NCAAT Committee uses RPI with some minor leeway on their assessments (teams need to be over .500; SoS, good Q1 wins-Quadrant 1 is defined as the top 50 RPI schools; schools playing better lately vs. schools stinking lately-tOSU vs. WVU). I need to reach out to my peers here to correct any flaws my hypothesis I am about to postulate on. [LIST] [*]There are 32 conferences with automatic bids. [*]16 of the those conferences have teams within the top 48-50 RPI ratings. [*]That means 16 conferences are outside the 48-50 range that will get a bid. [*]64 teams in the NCAAT minus 16 teams outside means the top 48 schools to vie for the remaining slots (16 automatic bids and the 32 at-large bids). [*]So, in theory, if your team is ranked 49 or higher in RPI, you are on the outside looking in with only a handful of regular season conference games to go to move your RPI. [*]That's my understanding. What am I missing? [/LIST] Now having said that, I am dumbfounded then that #54 Tennessee at 17-8, with a Quadrant 1 record of 1-8 with the 1 win over #28 LSU could be a) Ranked by any voter (6 freakin votes this week) b) or even considered on the bubble with 4 straight losses, 5-5 last 10 record. What hasn't been mentioned is UCF is at #41 RPI with a 1-4 Q1 (#17 Central Mich) yet I haven't heard them mentioned in or even as a bubble team, why? UCF SoS is #42 while Tenn is #75, UCF OOC is #20 while Tenn is #258. UCF has 4 straight wins, 6-4 in their last 10. Seriously, Tenn does not deserve to be in the NCAAT. There was some debate on Nebraska who is 16-10 but whose RPI is #86, SoS is #53, OOC is #264. Their Q1 is 3-9: their wins are #10 Iowa, #31 Duke, #35 Mich while they have 2 bad losses of Mich St #92, #71 Minn . The last good win came on Jan 19th, a month ago. They are 3-9 in their last 12. Why are they even a discussion at #86??? Next... What say you my knowledgeable colleagues because clearly I am confused. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,459
Messages
4,397,005
Members
10,209
Latest member
noelle
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
General Women's Basketball Forum
So, how is the bubble defined for the Tournament
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom