Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bags27, post: 2021355, member: 6761"] Are those types of fouls subject to immediate review and reversal? I mean, it happened so quickly and depending on one's angle, it could have been a foul. The TV angle, even the first time and in real time, suggested no foul (I though it was a travel). But the ref may have had a different angle. Are those foul calss reversible? If not, then you can only charge the ref with making a bad call, not on bad procedure. It was bad procedure that they didn't review the out-of-bounds alluded to above, in which it was clearly Coates who knocked the ball out. So that's a bad call and bad procedure, and that's bad refereeing. It's a sad thing that a ref can make a series of bad calls early but none near the end and get off the hook, while a ref could make good calls early but make one mistake at the end and everyone thinks that the referee cost the game and is a bad ref. [/QUOTE]