Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="businesslawyer, post: 4573262, member: 55"] Thank you for that. I don't know what I'm looking at, or what its methodology is, but it is certainly clear from that that some formulae think we've been much better than I did off the top of my head. It doesn't make sense to me we could be that high for that period without truly significant wins, as opposed to a number of Quad 1 wins, but maybe none of these teams had any or many either, or maybe they had bad losses during this period (which we certainly didn't). I'd have to go through everyone's schedule to check which I don't have time to do. But I am not denying at all that this formula may have a better grasp on who has been "better" than I do and I appreciate you sharing it. [/QUOTE]