Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="nomar, post: 2396612, member: 651"] Exactly. I hate saying Parrish is right, but he nailed it in saying this was the best case for a waiver you could have. -Beverly enrolled in [I]one[/I] class, in [I]May[/I]. -The kid would not have enrolled in that class but for the express representation by the AD that the coach would be retained. -The coach was fired [I]two weeks [/I]after the kid enrolled. This is a unique set of circumstances, distinguishable even from Sid's situation. Why bother having a formal waiver system if you're never going to grant one? Shouldn't the NCAA be encouraging students to enroll in school as early as possible to get a head start on their education? This punishes Beverly for doing just that. The NCAA sickens me. Nobody questions the rule. We are questioning the NCAA's hypocritical and cruel [I]discretionary[/I] enforcement of its rules. [/QUOTE]