Last year pre-conference we had 5 blowouts of 16 points or more. In fact, we beat Harvard 81-52. What happened when we got in the B.E.? We were blown out by Pitt and lost to ND. We won at home to USF by 5 in overtime. so we started out 1-2. Based on last year, it's hard for me to see any correlation on how good or bad we are now or will be in this year's B.E. On the surface, the B.E looks a bit down from last year- it's seems to be a case of the haves and the have-nots. Some of the teams that we are playing out of conference might be better than USF, ND, Rutgers and St Johns. I don't know, perhaps one or two of the mentioned teams will turn on a switch come conference time, and really improve. I thought that Rutgers would be better this year, and St Johns is way out of sync due to all the freshmen loses and Lavin's health issues. But ND, Rutgers and USF look really weak.
The article posits that the team is a work in progress, but what team isn't? UK made some bone-head plays against IU on Saturday. They'll learn from it. I thought that in certain bunches of minutes that the team really played well against Harvard, and perhaps that was UConn's best defensive game to date. But as many have said here, there was too much dribbling by the guards, and many lapses.
All in all, I think we're okay. Even after the win in Maui last year, there were a few games (USF, and Vermont to name two) that questioned whether that team would ever come around. It certainly did!