Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NHUConnfan, post: 5237888, member: 647"] Why are we even talking about non-student employees? They are 100% irrelevant. And I also didn't say that their student status doesn't give them protections. I didn't agree with your example which has many other issues. For student employment (that is, positions that are tied specifically to students), there are absolutely rules around their student status that ties into the terms of that employment. None of those terms are about clawing back money for work done. I'm specifically talking about their ability to transfer. If you think if School A puts in a clause to claw back funds if they decide to transfer, that will [I]never[/I] prevent a student from still packing their bags and entering into that university and employment at that university. Their protections as a student protects their ability to transfer. And recent rulings around restricting future earnings will prevent the second part of that. What I sense that you're getting at is trying to sever their status as students...and again, that's not college athletics. End of story. If that's what you're truly advocating, you're advocating for an amateur league, and if you think cash-strapped universities are the ones to create this, lmfao [/QUOTE]