Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="freescooter, post: 4205089, member: 1023"] Seton Hall isn’t very good. Spare me the NCAA bid stuff. This was a game we needed to win,and should have won and did win. As I’ve said repeatedly, when teams can’t stop Sanogo, we are good. When they figure out how to do it, either with a sagging d or just have a big who can more or less neutralize him, we struggle. The Hall clearly had no answers. As a side note, If I were the Hall, I’d be pretty concerned about my future, too. Rutgers resurgence under Pikeill is quite a thing. 4 straight over ranked teams…Seton Hall absolutely Needs to keep pace or it will sink to irrelevance in New Jersey. The past few decades, a slightly above average to slightly below average program was good enough when the major program in the state was embarrassingly awful. Now that Rutgers is heading in the right direction they could well become Seton Who? Let’s face it, except for a brief period 30 years ago, the Hall has never been much other than a W on the schedule. Certainly in Big East days, that was what they were. They had a brief revival of sorts in the NEWBIE when all the good programs left, but now seem to be returning to their natural spot in the second division. If Rutgers continues to perform they’ll be lucky to have their scores reported, never mind games being covered. [/QUOTE]