Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bballnut90, post: 3542175, member: 2117"] I don't see how either Taylor or Henderson gets an edge on the other. Henderson is clearly a better scorer than Taylor but Taylor has proven she can run the show and play efficiently unlike Destanni. Destanni's role was to bring scoring and energy off the bench, so she could be a stronger decision maker while she's running the show, but at this point I don't think anyone objectively can say one has the edge over the other right now. My take is: Taylor = Henderson...outlined above Cooke > Matharu...Matharu was excellent in limited minutes but Cooke is the clear choice headed into next year Beale < Jackson....no brainer Saxton/Amihere = Cooks...haven't seen enough of Cooks but she had decent numbers at Michigan State. I think Saxton/Amihere will fill in well at the 4. Hard to give one team a clear edge IMO. Boston > Carter...no brainer. Carter is good but the gap between the 2 is enormous. So 2-1 for SC with 2 ties. The gap between Boston and anyone she goes up against is a huge difference maker. Most important though is that SC has a far more proven coach and players who know her system and coaching style. Mississippi State doesn't, which further puts them behind SC IMO. SC is a legitimate title threat, Mississippi State a potential final four threat. Both should finish top 2 in the SEC and hopefully we get a great matchup during the regular season again. [/QUOTE]