Season almost over and no A game yet | The Boneyard

Season almost over and no A game yet

Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,756
Reaction Score
33,418
This team is the final product, no more fixing just tweaking. We have not seen our best full game performance this season where everything is in synch and our full potential shines. I'm not sure we really know how good this team can be and it's March.

So then, what does our A game look like or what do you want to see differently (realistically) that would help our 3peat?

-Maheney and Alex getting hot
-Beast mode Reed, without fouling
-Samson embracing bench role
-McNeeley taking over games

Any thoughts?
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
3,126
Reaction Score
22,179
We have played a few A games, it's just that our A game isn't as good as last year. This team's A game means 3+ starters play very well and no major minute player is a negative net impact. I'd say our A games this year were -
  • Texas - several guys played great and our defense was strong (Tre Johnson went nuts but against mostly solid defense)
  • Baylor - fell behind early but played strong, imposed our will, and had balanced production from pretty much everyone that played
  • Marquette - blitzed them early and we had amazing efficiency from multiple players while locking down Marquette
The last 2 years' A games meant crush-everyone-to-a-ring level performances. This year's A game means you can pick off top teams
 

YearoftheHusky

Name checks out.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,535
Reaction Score
10,872
I would argue perhaps we have played our a game. It just doesn’t look the same as what you expected after the last two years.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
1,819
Reaction Score
8,887
There is no A game, dude. They can’t defend at an elite level and have no sustainable guard play. Enjoy them for what they are. If they can get Reed consistently involved it does wonders because we are so 3 reliant and the low post threat creates inside out pressure which loosens thei 3 line.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
2,226
Reaction Score
14,252
We play as well as our backcourt guards.

If teams can penetrate and kick, we death spiral.
If teams struggle shooting, we will win by 10+

Our kryptonite all year has been ball penetration and 3-pt defense.

Our A game this year seems to be graded on a curve. It depends how well the other team plays to determine whether or not we get an “A.”

Not valedictorian level grades this year unfortunately.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
296
Reaction Score
1,000
It's kind of mind boggling that a Hurley coached team can't play mediocre defense. A lot of that is coaching, effort, reps. A lot of it is athleticism and size to be great. We don't have that, I get that.

But any Hurley coached team should be able to play at least mediocre presentable defense.

The last 2 games were wide open 3s by the opponent all game long. Yesterday's horrific defense was masked by our strong offense.
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,098
Reaction Score
6,278
If we can hit a run in March with Diarra healthy (on-ball defending and offensive facilitator), Reed a physical rebounder and an inside threat, Ball/McNeeley/Karaban all hitting from deep, McNeeley being super aggressive Thor, and JStew and Sampson being great off-the bench change of pace energy guys--we will be a very tough team to stop offensively.

Even with the above, our defense is probably not enough to outscore the truly elite teams this year (Auburn, Alabama, etc)....but if the above happens at all once we will be a team that no one would want to see and would have the ability to challenge for a Final Four berth.

Now is it realistic for all of that to hit at once....not likely. But if it does, we can certainly make a run for the FF.

But with this team...we could just as easily see a 2022 New Mexico or 2008 San Diego first round flame out. That is the joy/pain of this years team.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
1,766
Reaction Score
13,599
The question I have had all year is , why if our half court defense is so bad, why don't we full court press the other team. We have the depth for it, use it.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,384
Reaction Score
27,977
With defense this bad what can we reasonably expect? Teams shoot 3’s well against us that are usually bad and they drive to the hoop and score basically at will. We have rebounded decently.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2023
Messages
527
Reaction Score
1,624
If you doubt my huge man crush on Dan Hurley, just read my previous posts. HOWEVER, being objective here, Dan has been obtuse with his inability to change mid stream in the face of obvious decisions. I know that I am not his equal in terms of basketball acumen. And I know that he has better intelligence because I do not get to see practice, and he does. Having said those things:
  • Insisting to play man on man D with those high hedges with this personnel is insanely bad. Even the Georgetown's of this world abuse us. It has been obvious for months now that this team is not a good defensive team. Why not sprinkle a zone every so often? How about trapping? or a full court press? You have bodies on the bench that are athletic and long. I get it if we try and it does not work either. But to not have tried it at all???? Does not make sense to me.
  • Starting Samson. Listen, Samson has won me over. He improved this year, and I respect that. But we are better with Tarris at center. He is a better offensive player. Tarris is more prototypical than Samson, and our offensive sets run better when he is there. PLUS, maybe he is not getting in constant foul trouble if he gets in the flow of the game from the first whistle. But overall, Tarris is just better. Play your best players darn it. Again, to not have tried this at all is baffling.
  • Alternative lineups: For whatever reason, injury, bad practices, or a combo of both, Nowell has played barely any minutes this year. He is raw and a step behind. This kid has been riding the pine for months. Now we expect him to start playing at the same game speed as the rest of the team? At that position??? That is absurd. And since we know that Aidan is not the option (and have known that for some time), why not play Liam at the point, or Solo, or Ross, or freaking Alex for that matter. Doing so will make our lineup much taller, and more difficult to guard. Maybe that can't be done against the St. John's, 'Bama's of this world. But dang it, again, I would love to see if that would work against everybody else. And while on this topic, I know that I was not dreaming when I saw Singare play at a high level earlier in the year, getting contested offensive boards and blocking shots in competitive games. Geez, every once in a while play Tarris and Samson together. You know Alex can play the 5 and you have Singare collecting dust on the bench. Just different options; different looks to show the opponents. Listen, this is not last year. Aside from Liam and Solo, nobody is so indispensable that can't be benched.

I will make this point again: one more win and we are at 20 wins for the year. Not too shabby for a transition year. This program is in great shape with Dan Hurley. We are elite. And I think we can scare people this year. But we can be better, I believe, than we have shown. And I do think it starts with Dan.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,384
Reaction Score
27,977
If you doubt my huge man crush on Dan Hurley, just read my previous posts. HOWEVER, being objective here, Dan has been obtuse with his inability to change mid stream in the face of obvious decisions. I know that I am not his equal in terms of basketball acumen. And I know that he has better intelligence because I do not get to see practice, and he does. Having said those things:
  • Insisting to play man on man D with those high hedges with this personnel is insanely bad. Even the Georgetown's of this world abuse us. It has been obvious for months now that this team is not a good defensive team. Why not sprinkle a zone every so often? How about trapping? or a full court press? You have bodies on the bench that are athletic and long. I get it if we try and it does not work either. But to not have tried it at all???? Does not make sense to me.
  • Starting Samson. Listen, Samson has won me over. He improved this year, and I respect that. But we are better with Tarris at center. He is a better offensive player. Tarris is more prototypical than Samson, and our offensive sets run better when he is there. PLUS, maybe he is not getting in constant foul trouble if he gets in the flow of the game from the first whistle. But overall, Tarris is just better. Play your best players darn it. Again, to not have tried this at all is baffling.
  • Alternative lineups: For whatever reason, injury, bad practices, or a combo of both, Nowell has played barely any minutes this year. He is raw and a step behind. This kid has been riding the pine for months. Now we expect him to start playing at the same game speed as the rest of the team? At that position??? That is absurd. And since we know that Aidan is not the option (and have known that for some time), why not play Liam at the point, or Solo, or Ross, or freaking Alex for that matter. Doing so will make our lineup much taller, and more difficult to guard. Maybe that can't be done against the St. John's, 'Bama's of this world. But dang it, again, I would love to see if that would work against everybody else. And while on this topic, I know that I was not dreaming when I saw Singare play at a high level earlier in the year, getting contested offensive boards and blocking shots in competitive games. Geez, every once in a while play Tarris and Samson together. You know Alex can play the 5 and you have Singare collecting dust on the bench. Just different options; different looks to show the opponents. Listen, this is not last year. Aside from Liam and Solo, nobody is so indispensable that can't be benched.

I will make this point again: one more win and we are at 20 wins for the year. Not too shabby for a transition year. This program is in great shape with Dan Hurley. We are elite. And I think we can scare people this year. But we can be better, I believe, than we have shown. And I do think it starts with Dan.
You missed something. It wasn’t a transition year. According to Danny it was a 3 peat year. As fans what the hell do we know, we believed him.
We have been trying to figure the team out all season with the ups and downs expecting a switch to go off to become the title contender expected and we were nationally ranked at 3.
Season goes on and we slowly realize we have serious deficiencies with no point guard or injured one and terrible defense.
Still happy with the last 2 titles and the players here who are trying pretty hard for us.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,267
Reaction Score
20,406
The question I have had all year is , why if our half court defense is so bad, why don't we full court press the other team. We have the depth for it, use it.
We don’t have the personnel to do it well. Hassan is the only ball hawk we have. Full court presses tend to involve players who are quick and/or can read and react and anticipate. Alex has 14 steals all year (none in the last 5 games). Ross has 8. Mahaney has 5. Stewart has 4.

Who‘s the one jumping the passing lane after we trap?
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
296
Reaction Score
1,000
It's hard to imagine a run in the tournament if we can't win 2 games in a row since January. That being said everything is possible. Favorable match-ups? Who knows.

Ball/Karaban/LM - if 2 out of 3 show up, we beat most teams. All 3 show up we beat anyone. Cold night, we lose to anyone.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
189
Reaction Score
1,320
We don’t have the personnel to do it well. Hassan is the only ball hawk we have. Full court presses tend to involve players who are quick and/or can read and react and anticipate. Alex has 14 steals all year (none in the last 5 games). Ross has 8. Mahaney has 5. Stewart has 4.

Who‘s the one jumping the passing lane after we trap?
Full court presses are mostly used to tire the other team out and if you have shot blockers which we do , why not mix it up. It’s not necessarily a problem of personnel. We have length at the 3-5 which bothers teams.
 

StllH8L8ner

You’ll get nothing and like it!
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
2,329
Reaction Score
12,842
You missed something. It wasn’t a transition year. According to Danny it was a 3 peat year. As fans what the hell do we know, we believed him.
We have been trying to figure the team out all season with the ups and downs expecting a switch to go off to become the title contender expected and we were nationally ranked at 3.
Season goes on and we slowly realize we have serious deficiencies with no point guard or injured one and terrible defense.
Still happy with the last 2 titles and the players here who are trying pretty hard for us.
Three peating is nearly impossible.

Thee peating when you lose 4 of 5 NBA talent starters and you are depending on returning role players to fill those gaps is pretty much totally impossible unless everything that you expect to happen happens. I love Danny but he got a little over his skis with the three peat talk. There were a ton of question marks going into this season and many of them haven’t panned out unfortunately to go along with a lot of minutes missed bc of injuries. It happens.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
870
Reaction Score
5,730
Too many inconsistent players. When you multiply the probabilities of each having an “on” game, it becomes remote likelihood that all are “on” at the same time.

Sure there is some theoretical “A Game” we could achieve if everything fell the right way, but the chances of that happening are very small.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2018
Messages
1,026
Reaction Score
4,309
The biggest positive and most consistent thing that I have noticed is that we don't quit. We just don't have the horses.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,384
Reaction Score
27,977
The biggest positive and most consistent thing that I have noticed is that we don't quit. We just don't have the horses.
We had the ability with Clingan and Castle to completely shut teams down when needed, which spurred offensive surges. And Hass came off bench to be part of that. No more.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
5,583
Reaction Score
20,459
If you doubt my huge man crush on Dan Hurley, just read my previous posts. HOWEVER, being objective here, Dan has been obtuse with his inability to change mid stream in the face of obvious decisions. I know that I am not his equal in terms of basketball acumen. And I know that he has better intelligence because I do not get to see practice, and he does. Having said those things:
  • Insisting to play man on man D with those high hedges with this personnel is insanely bad. Even the Georgetown's of this world abuse us. It has been obvious for months now that this team is not a good defensive team. Why not sprinkle a zone every so often? How about trapping? or a full court press? You have bodies on the bench that are athletic and long. I get it if we try and it does not work either. But to not have tried it at all???? Does not make sense to me.
  • Starting Samson. Listen, Samson has won me over. He improved this year, and I respect that. But we are better with Tarris at center. He is a better offensive player. Tarris is more prototypical than Samson, and our offensive sets run better when he is there. PLUS, maybe he is not getting in constant foul trouble if he gets in the flow of the game from the first whistle. But overall, Tarris is just better. Play your best players darn it. Again, to not have tried this at all is baffling.
  • Alternative lineups: For whatever reason, injury, bad practices, or a combo of both, Nowell has played barely any minutes this year. He is raw and a step behind. This kid has been riding the pine for months. Now we expect him to start playing at the same game speed as the rest of the team? At that position??? That is absurd. And since we know that Aidan is not the option (and have known that for some time), why not play Liam at the point, or Solo, or Ross, or freaking Alex for that matter. Doing so will make our lineup much taller, and more difficult to guard. Maybe that can't be done against the St. John's, 'Bama's of this world. But dang it, again, I would love to see if that would work against everybody else. And while on this topic, I know that I was not dreaming when I saw Singare play at a high level earlier in the year, getting contested offensive boards and blocking shots in competitive games. Geez, every once in a while play Tarris and Samson together. You know Alex can play the 5 and you have Singare collecting dust on the bench. Just different options; different looks to show the opponents. Listen, this is not last year. Aside from Liam and Solo, nobody is so indispensable that can't be benched.

I will make this point again: one more win and we are at 20 wins for the year. Not too shabby for a transition year. This program is in great shape with Dan Hurley. We are elite. And I think we can scare people this year. But we can be better, I believe, than we have shown. And I do think it starts with Dan.
Summed it all up pretty well there, other than allowing AK to continue to have the green light. He needs to only shoot when wide open and within hailing distance of the 3 point line
 

Online statistics

Members online
308
Guests online
4,053
Total visitors
4,361

Forum statistics

Threads
161,679
Messages
4,273,932
Members
10,111
Latest member
Jsmoove1121


.
..
Top Bottom