Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="UConnNick, post: 3054694, member: 1526"]
I think we were a special case because Emmert, a/k/a Satan, has a major axe to grind with UCONN due to his mismanagement of the UConn 21 building program, and the resulting fallout from his shady business dealings connected with it. He had to really stretch the rules to make a penalty apply retroactively to UConn, and only UConn, regarding the APR nonsense.

What will be fascinating going forward is how the NCAA punishes any of the schools involved or implicated in the FBI sting. Emmert also worked at LSU for a while. If he has any reason to dislike them, will they get hammered worse than anybody else? If the media perceives that the penalties are being applied arbitrarily, it puts the NCAA in the uncomfortable position of having to explain disparate punishment for what are essentially the same or similar acts. They will likely try to avoid the appearance that there's any favoritism toward any particular school or schools compared to others.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach