Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Rowdy831, post: 5266934, member: 12516"] The term "generational talent" is way over used. All the players on the list are very good if not great basketball players but not generational talents. Michael Jordan was a generational talent, DT was a generational talent but the others on the list were just really good players that played on very good teams. They all had the "it" factor when the game was on the line but none of them other than DT (in my opinion) changed the game of basketball and that is my opinion of how you beome a "generational talent". Sarah is a great player but she hasn't had to carry the load for the team to this point so anything other than her being a good player would be very premature. You can't be generational when you aren't even the best in game at the current time which nobody outside of Storrs things of Sarah. She is great, she might end up being one of the greats to play at UConn but right now it is too soon to put any more pressure than that on her shoulders. I am a huge fan of UConn and have been as long as WCBB has had Geno so it isn't about being a hater, it is just about being measured in my eveluation of what a player has contributed, at least so far. In the end I hope she is the greatest of all time and changes that game and if that happens I will be the first to serve up some crow and enjoy her accomplishments. [/QUOTE]