Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Sad stats now in the per-40 spreadsheet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="JRRRJ, post: 4879297, member: 1303"] You can download the workbook [URL='http://www.jackromanowicz.com/downloads']here[/URL]. I can't credit all the posts I've seen saying the beat-down was completely due to playing a superior opponent with a depleted roster. UConn lost because they couldn't put the ball in the basket. They took exactly the same number of shot attempts (71) as SC. SC shot 36% in the first period, 15% below their average. UConn shot 26%, 25% below their average. UConn shot 14% from 3, 23% below their average and 19% below what SC managed (their average is 41%) in the first quarter. UConn's misses were not due to superior defense -- many were open shots left short or layups (10 of 23 -- 43% on [B]layups [/B]for the game. The team's entire 2-pt rate is 56.8%) -- and a few that were in-and-out. In the end, we had as many 3s as SC did (7). Our girls played hard, but they did not play to their capability on offense -- for what reason, we'll never know. The weaves worked pretty well -- people got open, but we didn't take advantage of the force that is Aaliyah often enough until the second half (when we played SC almost even), and we missed too many open shots. On defense, we held SC below both their 3-point and overall average. All of Nika's TOs just brought us to the same number of TOs that SC committed. Ah, well, here's the rate rankings as of today: [TABLE] [TR] [TD]Points[/TD] [TD]Paige 26.51[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 23.46[/TD] [TD]Q 16.84[/TD] [TD]Ashlynn 15.51[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Made FT[/TD] [TD]Paige 4.41[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 4.23[/TD] [TD]KK 2.54[/TD] [TD]Ice/Ashlynn ~1.0[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]ORB[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 3.12[/TD] [TD]Ice/Q ~1.9[/TD] [TD]Ines 1.6[/TD] [TD]Nika 1.47[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]DRB[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 8.72[/TD] [TD]Q 6.32[/TD] [TD]Paige/Ice ~5.1[/TD] [TD]Ines 4.40[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]TRB[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 11.84[/TD] [TD]Q 8.16[/TD] [TD]Ice 6.97[/TD] [TD]Paige 6.00[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Fouls[/TD] [TD]Ashlynn 1.55[/TD] [TD]Paige 2.44[/TD] [TD]Ines 2.80[/TD] [TD]Nika 3.04[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Assists[/TD] [TD]Nika 8.01[/TD] [TD]Paige 5.05[/TD] [TD]Ines 4.80[/TD] [TD]KK 4.36[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]TOs[/TD] [TD]Ashlynn 1.32[/TD] [TD]Q/Paige ~1.9[/TD] [TD]KK 2.59[/TD] [TD]Ines/Nika ~3.2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Blocks[/TD] [TD]Paige 1.49[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 1.11[/TD] [TD]Q 0.92[/TD] [TD]Ice 0.63[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Steals[/TD] [TD]KK/Paige ~3.0[/TD] [TD]Aaliyah 1.85[/TD] [TD]Nika 1.62[/TD] [TD]Q/Ashlynn/Ice ~ 1.1[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Sad stats now in the per-40 spreadsheet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom