JRRRJ
Chief Didacticist
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2011
- Messages
- 1,501
- Reaction Score
- 5,166
You can download the workbook here.
I can't credit all the posts I've seen saying the beat-down was completely due to playing a superior opponent with a depleted roster.
UConn lost because they couldn't put the ball in the basket. They took exactly the same number of shot attempts (71) as SC.
SC shot 36% in the first period, 15% below their average. UConn shot 26%, 25% below their average. UConn shot 14% from 3, 23% below their average and 19% below what SC managed (their average is 41%) in the first quarter. UConn's misses were not due to superior defense -- many were open shots left short or layups (10 of 23 -- 43% on layups for the game. The team's entire 2-pt rate is 56.8%) -- and a few that were in-and-out. In the end, we had as many 3s as SC did (7).
Our girls played hard, but they did not play to their capability on offense -- for what reason, we'll never know. The weaves worked pretty well -- people got open, but we didn't take advantage of the force that is Aaliyah often enough until the second half (when we played SC almost even), and we missed too many open shots.
On defense, we held SC below both their 3-point and overall average. All of Nika's TOs just brought us to the same number of TOs that SC committed.
Ah, well, here's the rate rankings as of today:
I can't credit all the posts I've seen saying the beat-down was completely due to playing a superior opponent with a depleted roster.
UConn lost because they couldn't put the ball in the basket. They took exactly the same number of shot attempts (71) as SC.
SC shot 36% in the first period, 15% below their average. UConn shot 26%, 25% below their average. UConn shot 14% from 3, 23% below their average and 19% below what SC managed (their average is 41%) in the first quarter. UConn's misses were not due to superior defense -- many were open shots left short or layups (10 of 23 -- 43% on layups for the game. The team's entire 2-pt rate is 56.8%) -- and a few that were in-and-out. In the end, we had as many 3s as SC did (7).
Our girls played hard, but they did not play to their capability on offense -- for what reason, we'll never know. The weaves worked pretty well -- people got open, but we didn't take advantage of the force that is Aaliyah often enough until the second half (when we played SC almost even), and we missed too many open shots.
On defense, we held SC below both their 3-point and overall average. All of Nika's TOs just brought us to the same number of TOs that SC committed.
Ah, well, here's the rate rankings as of today:
Points | Paige 26.51 | Aaliyah 23.46 | Q 16.84 | Ashlynn 15.51 |
Made FT | Paige 4.41 | Aaliyah 4.23 | KK 2.54 | Ice/Ashlynn ~1.0 |
ORB | Aaliyah 3.12 | Ice/Q ~1.9 | Ines 1.6 | Nika 1.47 |
DRB | Aaliyah 8.72 | Q 6.32 | Paige/Ice ~5.1 | Ines 4.40 |
TRB | Aaliyah 11.84 | Q 8.16 | Ice 6.97 | Paige 6.00 |
Fouls | Ashlynn 1.55 | Paige 2.44 | Ines 2.80 | Nika 3.04 |
Assists | Nika 8.01 | Paige 5.05 | Ines 4.80 | KK 4.36 |
TOs | Ashlynn 1.32 | Q/Paige ~1.9 | KK 2.59 | Ines/Nika ~3.2 |
Blocks | Paige 1.49 | Aaliyah 1.11 | Q 0.92 | Ice 0.63 |
Steals | KK/Paige ~3.0 | Aaliyah 1.85 | Nika 1.62 | Q/Ashlynn/Ice ~ 1.1 |