- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,758
- Reaction Score
- 143,865
Kobe is definitely part of the reason the Lakers are in the situation they're in, but he's also the reason they have 5 more championships so it's an equal trade off IMO.It's an eye opener to see the sheer competitiveness of these 2 players. You have to have the talent sure but it's that inner drive that produces champions and I thank heaven that we had guys like Rip, Ray, Kemba and Bazz. Now one thing about Kobe, as great as he was he threw the Lakers under the bus so that he could have a glorious walk off his last contract, all about him, always was, couldn't play second banana to Shaquille or anyone else. Should have taken less money and played a supportive role for rebuilding, rather than squeeze the life out of his team. Not exactly a team concept.
Disagree, there are valid points to both sides - in theory you are right that individual athletes have no duty or obligation to take less money and even if they do there's no guarantee that the team will spend the $ given up (See Brady, Tom), but there are also examples like Tim Duncan where this absolutely works. Its situational and possible for both things to be true at the same time.The idea that Kobe should have given up 12-15 million dollars for the sake of the Lakers is ridiculous. First, that is a ton of money. Second, I'm sure Kobe expected to get healthy and lead the team to a much better record and, if it went really well, delay retirement. Nothing broke their way and his health didn't rebound. It's over, he's gone and the Lakers go from here. After 20 years the Lakers have no superstar and need to find one. Next year the arena will be a morgue and people will realize Kobe was the Lakers.
No question about the championships and what he did for them, but some teams are sentimental and are willing to make the tradeoff and some are not. Case in point the Yankees who continue to pay aging superstars like Jeter as they ride off into the sunset. The Red Sox do not have that sentimentality no matter what the player did for them. If Poppy didn't cut it last year he would have no farewell tour. Based on performance did Kobe merit that contract, because at the time there was a lot written that he didn't.Kobe is definitely part of the reason the Lakers are in the situation they're in, but he's also the reason they have 5 more championships so it's an equal trade off IMO.
The problem was at the time the Laker's had little to build around Kobe and he was a HUGE risk for decline/injury. But they are the Lakers and knew their history of attracting free agents could buoy their chances and they were willing to go over the salary cap if it advantageous. Then they got unlucky (or in hindsight predictable) with Kobe's & Nash's injuries plus Dwight Howard fiasco that doomed the team the last 3 seasons. So although Kobe's contract was nothing but the max, I think both sides went into it with the understanding that the Lakers would still spend any necessary or advisable $ to win. So on court results would have worked out almost the exact same whether Kobe was paid 12M/year or the max. And although the contract was a bust for 2013-14 and 2014-15 seasons in neither year was the money preventing them from being competitive. Then the counterintuitive happy ending this year and Kobe's stardom despite lousy play created a highly entertaining season worth every $ they paid him.No question about the championships and what he did for them, but some teams are sentimental and are willing to make the tradeoff and some are not. Case in point the Yankees who continue to pay aging superstars like Jeter as they ride off into the sunset. The Red Sox do not have that sentimentality no matter what the player did for them. If Poppy didn't cut it last year he would have no farewell tour. Based on performance did Kobe merit that contract, because at the time there was a lot written that he didn't.