Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Reggie Miller is better than Steph Curry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="auror, post: 3557207, member: 1329"] Reggie wasn't an alpha. In the Drexler thread, I had tried to formulate an argument that Miller was better because he was underappreciated in his time and typed up a bunch of stuff but my research convinced me that he was not. I let evidence convince me of something and didn't post. Instead I posted some advanced stats that showed Drexler was better. The main issue with Reggie's statistical and real life career is his usage %. He was incredibly efficient. His total points per shot attempt is fantastic. He played a ton of minutes with great career longevity. He didn't turn the ball over much. But he wasn't using the ball nearly at a level commensurate with other star players. He wasn't play-making, he wasn't getting others good shots. His team's offenses were good but not incredible, because he didn't have as big of an impact as some others. This also allowed his efficiency to be so high, due to the usage skill curve. He had a >25% usage rate twice in his 18 year career and his average is 21.6%, median 22.2%. Guys in that range this year in the league: Malik Monk, Kelly Oubre Jr, Terrance Ross, Bogdan Bogdanovic (the worse Bogdanovic). Those 2 years he reached 25%+ he was in the CJ McCollum/Buddy Hield range of usage. His best finish was 19th in usage % in the league. Curry has been 30+% usage 5 times. His average and median are both several % points higher than Miller's peak. If your argument is that Miller wasn't allowed to take more shots "by the man" or the league wouldn't let him: In Miller's peak years, Mitch Richmond took about the same % of his shots from 3 as Miller, but also had a usage rate in the high 20s, 2nd in the league behind Jordan who was in the 30s. As others have mentioned, he was a catch and shoot player. Now, there is certainly an argument that being catch and shoot, his gravity and spacing were not well known at the time. Especially when comparing to someone like Drexler. But you can't use that argument in comparison to Steph, the player with the most gravity of all time. Steph is better. There's no argument to the contrary. I know we're all bored, but damn. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Reggie Miller is better than Steph Curry
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom