Not really sure what you're talking about.
They got whistle-happy down the stretch, which was obnoxious, but nothing seemed shady about it. Just the usual incompetence we see from college refs.
I saw some shady stuff. The double foul, and then the foul on the Miss center fighting for position which ended in 2 free throws for Lyles.
I saw some shady stuff. The double foul, and then the foul on the Miss center fighting for position which ended in 2 free throws for Lyles.
Nope. Ole Miss lost because they got really stupid at the end. That's it.
Nope. Ole Miss lost because they got really stupid at the end. That's it.
Don't read into things when they're not actually said. Did you read where I said the loss was on the refs? Be that as it may, the refs contributed to Ole Miss's loss. Without an absolute doubt.
With many, many doubts. The refs did nothing out of the ordinary.
And don't pretend that you're not, at least in part, blaming the loss on the officiating. If you're going to cite a bunch of plays at the end of a game that was super-close, you're obviously saying that different officiating could have changed the outcome.
Other than the double foul call (which shouldn't even be allowed, it's a cop out) the refs seemed fine to me. Ole Miss needed to drive the lane in the last possession of regulation. Jacking up an NBA three made no sense, and they were never taking that game in OT
The foul/block by Saiz and the call that sent Lyles to the line were really bad.
Not blowing 3 big calls would have changed the outcome. obviously, the game went into OT.
The Saiz call was pretty borderline. In real-time, I was sure it was a foul. I was 50/50 after watching the replay. I don't know the Lyles play you're talking about.
So then yes, you admit you're blaming the refs for UK winning.
I missed the game and can't find a box score with minutes played....is Calipari sticking with the platoon system or has that ship sailed already?