Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="husky8273, post: 1354512, member: 639"]
The cited language only refers to the candidates that are presented for the 2 alumni trustees which by state statute has been done by the Alumni Association.  As an example of the the Administration's dictatorial methods, it  "deemed" this role was transferred to the Foundation a few months ago; quite a self serving and questionable interpretation of the statute.

The members of the Alumni Committee which is separate and distinct from the Alumni trustees will be appointed by the Foundation, no longer elected by the Alumni.  The majority of the Alumni Committee must be Foundation board members who are also appointed, not elected.  This appointed Committee will control all future Alumni trustee nominees.

So just as you open up the Alumni Association to all alumni without the need for dues, you remove the ability of the Alumni to have a say its leadership and reserve it to a few appointed by the Administration.    How is this inclusive?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach