Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Entertainment
Recently watched movies 2025
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="nelsonmuntz, post: 5347305, member: 833"] [B]Tulip Fever (2017) [/B]- How does a movie with a budget and cast this big have such a silly script? I wonder what Christoph Walz, Alicia Vikander, Zach Galifinakis (with a small role), Judi Dench, and about half a dozen "that guy" actors thought they were signing up for when they agreed to this movie. The reviews are not kind to Dave DeHaan, who plays part of the love triangle. He is pretty, which is why he got the part, but he didn't sink the movie. Pros: The movie makes 1630's Amsterdam seem pretty cool. The city is vibrant and alive and interesting, where so many period films make the time and place seem miserable and dreary. The tulip market is also vibrant in the movie, and one of the more realistic portrayals of the mob psychology of a financial market in any movie. Cons: The last 20 minutes were ridiculous, and the script was not a exactly a masterpiece before that. The dialogue could have used a comprehensive re-write because the friend has to keep jumping in as narrator, likely because in editing they realized no one would understand what was happening because so much of the dialogue was pointless and meandering. I knew what the movie was about, and I was still surprised when Vikander and DeHaan's characters got together because there had been little indication there was any sexual energy between them up to that point. I get that Vikander can act, but I find her generic and lacking charisma. Edit: This was Harvey Weinstein’s final film, which may explain why it is such a mess. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,636
Messages
4,404,516
Members
10,218
Latest member
GABasket
.
..
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Entertainment
Recently watched movies 2025
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom