Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="cttxus, post: 5332158, member: 183"] Not to go down too deep of a rabbit hole here but, is the data used in the AI models cited above de-duped in any way, i.e. by BY poster or IP address? In other words, if I posted 100 times under one or multiple screen names that yesterday's loss meant nothing and UConn will be ranked in the FBS Top 10 by season end, would that affect the AI analysis and results? I'm not an AI technical expert by any means but AI definitely gives me pause. I've been in the industry for awhile and know enough about AI models, including their tendency to sometimes hallucinate (make conclusions derived from missing or questionable data), to ask that question. Having said that, I agree with the AI analysis presented here, but I'm still leery about AI's potential to shape narratives. BTW, I'd still like to hear analysis provided by informed humans, and therefore hope BL reconsiders and does, and continues to do, a "View from Section 241". ;-) FWIW, my personal summary of yesterday's game is that we played really well for 3+ quarters, and was very gratified by our performance. However, we made some unfortunate and obvious unforced errors afterwards that cost us the win. So, taking it as a tough learning experience, it's now up to all the humans involved to address the errors made and move forward with a mindset that we expect to win all the remaining games on the schedule, one game at a time. [/QUOTE]