Indiana = no (not even Quad 2)Are the following wins considered quad one wins?
Indiana (Neutral)
Texas (Neutral)
North Carolina (Neutral)
Gonzaga (Neutral)
Well Indiana my take down Kansas and make our win look better..Indiana = no (not even Quad 2)
Texas = no
UNC = yes
Gonzaga = yes
These are subject to change
They are all good wins, 1-2 determined by how these teams do throughout the entire season. Its fluid situation. If indiana managed to beat kansas that would have helped. My guess, all but indiana will ultimately be quad 1Are the following wins considered quad one wins?
Indiana (Neutral)
Texas (Neutral)
North Carolina (Neutral)
Gonzaga (Neutral)
Are the following wins considered quad one wins?
Indiana (Neutral)
Texas (Neutral)
North Carolina (Neutral)
Gonzaga (Neutral)
By the end of the season they end up pretty similar.I wish they’d use Kenpom instead of net for quad wins. I think it’s more accurate
Kinda silly to not acknowledge one game was played at MSG while the other was in Bloomington with their fans in a frenzyIndiana choked unfortunately… Never seen a team like Kansas get so many breaks - they are a good team but they barely squeaked by a team we best by 20..
Even sillier to not acknowledge that MSG on that day was a neutral court. In fact, the Indiana fans were more vocal for long periods of that game. How do I know that? I was there.Kinda silly to not acknowledge one game was played at MSG while the other was in Bloomington with their fans in a frenzy
You know who else was there, I was, and MSG atmosphere was not even comparable to the crowd on full tilt in Bloomington. Not sure how playing in a true road environment is not seen as more difficult than a neutral game but this is the boneyard so why am I not surprised that this is even being argued.Even sillier to not acknowledge that MSG on that day was a neutral court. In fact, the Indiana fans were more vocal for long periods of that game. How do I know that? I was there.
Kansas has a lot of things happen yesterday to win that game.
Some was them rising to the occasion.
Others were weird bounces / calls that went their way.
Kansas did not look like top 5 team yesterday playing unranked team.
I am not only surprised it’s being argued but surprised it even came up as a topic.You know who else was there, I was, and MSG atmosphere was not even comparable to the crowd on full tilt in Bloomington. Not sure how playing in a true road environment is not seen as more difficult than a neutral game but this is the boneyard so why am I not surprised that this is even being argued.
St. John’s is very close to being a Q1 win and it’s possible Texas can nudge up there too.So a few days ago, we were sitting at 3-1 in quad 1 games. Today we're 3-2. Which at first doesn't look as good, but I guess the Seton Hall loss now looks better as a Q1 than a Q2. Right?? Weird...
OH, and here I thought he just left the "T" out............I had to look up "WF" for Wells Fargo.
I mean a Q1 loss should look better than a Q2 loss, obviously?So a few days ago, we were sitting at 3-1 in quad 1 games. Today we're 3-2. Which at first doesn't look as good, but I guess the Seton Hall loss now looks better as a Q1 than a Q2. Right?? Weird...
For computers, a Q1 loss is strictly better than a Q2 loss.I mean a Q1 loss should look better than a Q2 loss, obviously?
Makes sense..... And now when we win @ Xavier, that's a Quad 1 win because its a road win vs a #52 NET rated team. Yay!!!For computers, a Q1 loss is strictly better than a Q2 loss.
Sometimes, humans get biased in how they look at it.
4-0 Q1, 5-1 Q2.
vs.
4-1 Q1, 5-0 Q2.
Your brain probably wants to take the first option. Putting the loss in the "less important" quadrant. The "eliteness" of the undefeated or gaudy Q1 record can be considered superior to being undefeated in Q2 with a better loss. It's not, but sometimes people perceive it that way.
Doomed!!!!Makes sense..... And now when we win @ Xavier, that's a Quad 1 win because it’s a road win vs a #52 NET rated team.