Haha Is that because you wikibomb people when you are unhappy with them?
What did you get banned for mrs Whittmer?
Out of control... Just saying. There is a point in all things when one goes overboard and begins to lose "credibility" even on an Internet message board. I think you are nearing that point quickly. I realize you can tell me to STFU and hey - maybe you should but...
Haha Is that because you wikibomb people when you are unhappy with them?
Rather than spamming Wikipedia, I think people would be better off writing in a bunch of letters to the editor to the Courant and all the other local newspapers. If they get a bunch of them, at least one should be published. They had no problem posting JC editorials during the "not a dime back" time
i only did it once and that was the leach page as a joke. i have never been allowed to change a page since. i think they somehow mark your ip down as not trustworthy or something.
im fine being out of control. hell i hope u think so. until bc fans got this out of control with things nothing happened. it took them years of crazy stuff to get gene to say by and spaz will be soon enough now. i'm trying to prevent those next 4 years of sorrow and death to uconn and cutting the head of the problem off right now. unless u want a couple more years of this current uconn football u should join me to some degree.
taking things to random media doesn't hurt the kids on the field or the school money wise. but if things go past this week/december then other measures should be taken for the good of the team and this fan base.
The reason that I'm saying you are going too far is that Wikipedia is trying to be a legit encyclopedia. This is where school kids now go to learn (for better or for worse). I'm not saying that your anger is going too far. Hell, I'm not even saying that your emails to Warde and Susan are going to far. But screwing with an encyclopedia, to me, is going too far.
There's a lot of other ways to channel your anger, and this in my opinion, is not a healthy one...
don't blame the source, blame the douches who abuse it for their own amusementEh, Wikipedia is not "a legit encyclopedia" and can't ever be, but it has morphed into a useful compilation site. That's more than I thought it would ever be when I invented it. What, you don't believe that I invented Wikipedia? Just look up my handle, it says it right there...just wait about 15 minutes before you check.
don't blame the source, blame the douches who abuse it for their own amusement
The fact that "douches (can) abuse it for their own amusement" is exactly why it's not a credible source. It is useful, though, as a compilation source but people, particularly students, need to few it with considerable skeptism.
We'll have to disagree, I am of the belief that just because you "can" do something doesn't mean you "should" do it. I would expect that response from my 7 and 3 year old not an adult. The anonimity that the internet provides makes people feel that its okay to do and say anything. If you don't have anyting factual to add to a wiki page that can be substantiated why would you do it? It's the ones who add to it just because they "can" that ruined it.
And we have all been a on occasion so don't take it personal Dan.
We'll have to disagree, I am of the belief that just because you "can" do something doesn't mean you "should" do it. I would expect that response from my 7 and 3 year old not an adult. The anonimity that the internet provides makes people feel that its okay to do and say anything. If you don't have anyting factual to add to a wiki page that can be substantiated why would you do it? It's the ones who add to it just because they "can" that ruined it.
And we have all been a on occasion so don't take it personal Dan.