Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KingAG, post: 4210178, member: 6716"] They do not have a better resume. They have a better record. I would've done a blind resume test but itd have been too obvious. Providence: [B]Record: 22-3(12-2) NET: 27 Result Based Metrics([/B]Obviously will be their strongest Metrics)[B]: KPI: 8 SOR: 9 Predictive Based Metrics: BPI: 41 KenPom: 44 SAG: 32 Quad W/L: Quad 1: 6-2 Quad 2: 6-1 Quad 3:4-0 Quad 4: 6-0 NET SOS: 47 Non-Conf SOS: 119 RPI SOS: 70 Connecticut Record: 19-7(10-5) NET: 17 Result Based Metrics: KPI: 22 SOR: 25 Predictive Based Metrics: BPI: 18 KenPom: 18 SAG: 16 Quad Wins: Quad 1: 5-6 Quad 2: 6-1 Quad 3:1-0 Quad 4:7-0 NET SOS: 36 Non Conf SOS: 120 RPI SOS: 45[/B] I mean you be the judge. We have 1 less Quad 1 win, but have played 3 more quad one games. But they have 3 more Quad 3 games. Lets play a game and take 3 of our Q1 losses and substitute them with an assumptive 3 Q3 wins. That puts our record as 25-4. Which is why the predictive Metrics favor us in a very substantial way over PC. The W-L record is deceptive when deciding who has the better resume. [/QUOTE]