Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="LwrcasefaN, post: 4214492, member: 11185"] Not sure what you mean by compatible. Expand on that if you wouldn't mind. The incentive is as I suggested to grow the game. The game they say they love. Every tournament there are players that thrive that very few have heard of...Angel Baker and Alexus Dye come to mind. You have really good players like Fair on Buffalo, Jasmine Dickey from Delaware, Park Lane from Seton Hall...etc who fans don't see a lot for many reasons from their team standing, the conference they are in, regional viewing restrictions. If the women's game is to grow it needs as broad exposure as possible. I didn't mention profit and specifically profit as a motive because...I wasn't thinking about that. Having said that what sporting event are you watching these days where someone isn't making money? The point of such a game is exposure. That's the WIN. What's the point of ANY allstar game? Players don't have to assemble a team. You ever play pickup and you go back and forth choosing? Keep it simple and fun. Who would pay airfare. I don't know. A school who wants exposure for their program perhaps? Ideally, the NCAA. They don't seem particularly busy. [/QUOTE]