Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="EricLA, post: 3864514, member: 26"] This is exactly what pisses me off on the national awards (not what you said, but the reality). If Christyn was the star player on any other big east team, she'd be putting up monster numbers. So do you vote for the best players, or the players with the best numbers? What bugs me (not to hijack the thread), is... why is Boston being touted as not only 1st team AA, but possible NPOY candidate? Her NUMBERS put her no better than honorable mention, but people wet themselves over her because she's on a top team and CAN be dominant. She doesn't even have the best numbers on her own team. So back to the BE - clearly if the awards roll out as were predicted, Olivia and Christyn are being judged on their NUMBERS, not on how good they are. IMHO can't have it both ways. National awards should NOT be based on how "good" anyone is. It's why I think players like Anastasia Hayes and Kiersten Bell should be considered near the top for national recognition. Obviously just my opinion. [/QUOTE]