Would it make any sense to play Alex at the 5 and Andre at the 4? Alex clearly cant play the 4, but he is effective playing the 5 and he does have some low post back to the basket moves that Andre doesnt have yet. And since Andre's entire offense is basically alley oops and dunks, would that translate to the 4? I think hed have a tough time defending there, but he could catch and pass out of the high post and still run the break at the 4. Weve gotten nothing from the 4 spot basically other than sporadic play from Olander. Cant hurt to try right?? Dont see really what else there is to try.
Dude it doesn't matter who plays the 4 or 5 its the same except the guy whose smaller plays the 4 spot. Now as for lineup changes it needs to be drastic and immediate. I know a lot of us stick up for Napier and rightfully so because he can shoot it and score when hes open, but he's not our leader and is not a point guard. He plays like a 2 guard and is unwilling or unable to break the zone by penetrating. Ryan had a bad game shooting yesterday missing a lot of easy ones, but he penetrated well and missed some easy layups, short jumpers, and passes to open bigs. Boatright is better at the 1 and has the quickness needed to break the zone. Napier needs to play off the ball more where he can shoot the rock because he's a great shooter. It is unlikely to happen but my lineup would be this for west virginia game on monday.
1 Boat 2: Lamb 3: Giffey/Daniels 4.) Roscoe 5.) Drummond
Bench: Napier, Oriakhi, Olander
We need tougness, grit, leadership and this lineup will bring that more so than the current lineup. Drummond needs to work on his back to the basket game because its so simple and its frustrating that a guy that talented hasn't developed one or 2 moves yet in his career.