Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Possible Big 12 Invite rumors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="upstater, post: 4658568, member: 153"] Schools without D1 athletic programs have sky high applications and brand / name recognition. You can even look at state schools like Vermont, and they have the same kind of high applications that UConn does. It's a dynamic going on everywhere. As long as schools maintain the same in-state / out-of-state balance that they do (80/20), there is little benefit. In terms of branding, yes. Athletics will sell more sweatshirts. But by and large, the kids going to the top publics would go there regardless, since so many students are limited to going in-state. As for who pays for a particular building, in many cases it is the departments. So many facilities are built with research grant funding. In fact, at my school, our department owns parts of the building because we purchased it with our money. If someone wants it, we rent it out. We operate as a collective with other departments who also own their own classrooms and office space. We pay for any tech enhancements, we pay for upkeep. The actual college only owns maybe 5 rooms on 10 floors of this building. I run a university program that uses a performance space (a music hall) in town, precisely because the person who owns it (a well known singer) lets us use it for free. If I wanted to run our stuff at the music hall on campus, the school of the arts would want a huge rental fee from our program, because they built it with their own money. Going back to Oklahoma State, remember this story? [URL='https://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/pickens-huge-donation-for-oklahoma-state-athletics-may-be-wiped-out/']Pickens’ Huge Donation for Oklahoma State Athletics May Be Wiped Out[/URL] It ended up that OSU faculty won a $400m research grant that required a new building for the research. But the school could not bond the building because their credit rating was impacted by the high debt from going forward with the building of the stadium despite the very high losses in their endowment and the money that Boone promised but could not immediately provide. After OSU could not bond the research building, the faculty actually lost the grant. Pickens came through several years later in 2012 and provided the funding to finish the building (which was counted as athletics revenue) but in the meantime, OSU had lost the biggest research grant in its history. These grants do indeed pay for buildings. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Possible Big 12 Invite rumors
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom