Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Please Repeat After Me: UConn’s Problem on Friday was DEFENSE, not OFFENSE!
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="JoePgh, post: 2669908, member: 1131"] I have been reading this forum since the game ended on Friday night, and have limited my comments. Many of the comments border on the insane in their disregard for basic facts (never mind the loony theories about a conspiracy among referees and the NCAA to make Notre Dame the winner). So I will confine my reply to one point: UConn’s problem on Friday night was on DEFENSE. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the offense, except that no one other than KLS was hitting 3’s. The fact that they were able to score 89 points (79 in regulation) despite mostly cold 3-point shooting is actually a credit to the efficiency of the offense in difficult circumstances. Mississippi State was able to score only 58 points against the same Notre Dame defense in the same amount of time. In fact, UConn shot 49% for the game, hardly an indication of ineffective offense. They had 20 assists on 38 field goals. They even finished the game shooting 38% from the 3-point line (better than Notre Dame). So please quit with the jive about how Muffet’s brilliant, well-prepared defense left the UConn offense sputtering. No such thing occurred. Even late in the game, when they really needed to score, both Crystal and Napheesa got open 3-point looks which they made under pressure. UConn’s big problem, and the reason they lost, was inadequate defense. There is no way that Notre Dame should have scored 91 points, including 79 in regulation. Notre Dame shot 47% from the field, which IS an indication of relatively ineffective defense, compared to UConn’s normal performance even against top teams. Mississippi State held the same offense to 61 points, something that UConn should have been able to do. I have no answer for why Geno did not continue the zone defense, which had worked so well in the second quarter, into the second half, or why he didn’t give Azura more minutes. I would be interested in his answers if someone asks those questions. But those are the questions that Boneyarders should be asking (and several of you did), rather than making uninformed comments about how the offense needs to be completely overhauled. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Please Repeat After Me: UConn’s Problem on Friday was DEFENSE, not OFFENSE!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom